A Bargaining Model of Holdouts and Takings
نویسندگان
چکیده
The holdout problem is commonly cited as the justification for eminent domain, but the nature of the problem is not well understood. This paper models the holdout problem in a bargaining framework, where a developer seeks to acquire several parcels of land for a large-scale development. We show that in the absence of eminent domain, holdouts are inevitable, threatening costly delay. However, if the developer has the power to use eminent domain to acquire the land from holdouts, all sellers will bargain, thus avoiding delay. An offsetting cost is that owners may negotiate prices below their true value, possibly resulting in excessive transfer of land to the developer. Journal of Economic Literature Classification: C78, K11, R14, R52
منابع مشابه
Opportunism in Sequential Investment Settings: On Strategies for Overcoming Holdups and Holdouts
Economic theory suggests that, although the holdup and holdout problems arise in different contexts and are typically treated as disparate, they represent the same underlying economic problem. In particular, both involve an up-front investment that reduces the investor’s bargaining power with the seller of a necessary input and thereby lead to under-investment. This paper explores the implicati...
متن کاملEmploying a Multi-Criteria Approach under Bankruptcy Conditions for Optimal Allocation of Shared Water Resources through Using Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Method
Management based on the flexibility, fairness, and sustainability characteristics of water resources may play a key role in preventing the continuation of the crisis process as well as reducing water users’ conflict. In the present research, the framework for the optimal allocation of shared water resources was presented using a combination of bankruptcy concepts and asymmetric Nash bargaining....
متن کاملMeasuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملDoes Scale of Public Hospitals Affect Bargaining Power? Evidence From Japan
Background Many of public hospitals in Japan have had a deficit for a long time. Japanese local governments have been encouraging public hospitals to use group purchasing of drugs to benefit from the economies of scale, and increase their bargaining power for obtaining discounts in drug purchasing, thus improving their financial situation. In this study, we empirically investigate whether or no...
متن کاملThe Economic Impacts of Eminent Domain
We model government takings of private property, embedding prominent theories of their economic consequences. Random assignment of U.S. judges and the fact that judges make takings precedent in a manner correlated with their race, political party, and prior government advocacy facilitate causal estimates of allowing government takings. Novel data on judicial biographies and takings decisions si...
متن کامل